Financial services for next billion? [Part 3] – Insurance

This is the third in series of articles on “Financial services for next billion?” that I will be basing on the book – Portfolios of the poor. Similar to my last post, in this one I have covered chapter 3 of this book in Q&A format, covering pieces around risk coverage and insurance products for poor.

Who to trust whom: Insurance provider vs lender?
“the insurance company must earn the trust of customers, while for credit the reverse is true: it is customers who must earn the trust of bankers.”

What happens when emergencies happen?
“When emergencies happen, households reach for whatever resources they can. Often these coping mechanisms are expensive. Worse, they may seriously damage the household and its future prospects, devouring assets or destroying livelihoods or imposing intolerable debt.”
“Health problems rapidly become financial problems.”
“specialised instruments – formal or informal- are unavailable or insufficient, emergencies are addressed by selling assets, drawing down savings, and borrowing. Loans are a critical part of this mix, reminding us once again that borrowing for poor people is not only, or even mostly, for funding businesses but also for managing the many exigencies of a life of poverty.”

Why insurance is better suited for emergencies but poor still prefer loans?
“the financial tools poor households turn to when in trouble are often loans. Better ways to borrow reliably and at reasonable prices would have helped them….loans are not the best solution to such medical emergencies. These are problems of risk – problems for which insurance is designed.”
“Only insurance arrangements (or tax funded public safety nets) can aggregate these kinds of risks, provide urgently needed resources at the right time, and do so without creating additional obligations.”

Why insurance companies are partnering with MFIs?
“would have been easier to manage if the premium was collected weekly or biweekly in smaller amounts. Such policies do exist, but agents are reluctant to offer them because they entail more visits to the client. The unintended consequence is to screen out customers who are willing and able to pay but who require a payment plan more sensitive to cash flow.”
“One solution, which is increasingly being seized on by insurers in India and elsewhere, is to partner with a micro finance institution that regularly meets with customers – and engage it as the agent for premium collection.”
“The micro-finance institutions, of course, have such a foundation: they run weekly meetings with batches of clients with whom they have many transactions, so it much easier for them to bring on new products.”
“nearly all micro-finance providers were offering debt forgiveness on death, or “credit-life” insurance, as one of the features of their lending. Payment for these schemes was built into the price of the loan, so they don’t appear separately in the portfolios.”

What can be non-insurable?
“such as crop or livestock loss, are harder to implement in practice because of moral hazard, outright fraud and documentation difficulties – it is notoriously difficult to know exactly whose cow it was that died, or indeed whether it died of natural causes.”

Why informal or semiformal insurance providers find it difficult to develop insurance product?
“To work, informal insurance schemes need to bind users together in associations that endure over long periods of time, a task that gets ever harder as populations become more mobile and occupations individualised.”
“providing insurance profitably also entails high-quality actuarial analysis, careful pricing policies, and wise investments: these are complex skills not widely available outside the formal insurance industry, a fact that makes it hard for informal and semiformal providers to compete with formal providers that they have so spectacularly succeeded in doing for microcredit.”

How and what to design insurance products for the poor?
“given all of the other elements of designing a workable insurance product, it is easy to over-look the important role of a convenient payment plan.”
“bring down the costs and increase the speed of verifying claims and making payouts.”
“it is not just the total cost of the product that matters: it is also the timing and size of instalments.”
“SEWA Bank……has even built health insurance into its savings products, when it docks premiums directly from returns on the fixed depositions of women members.”
“innovative financiers can also build risk-mitigating functions into services already being mass-marketed to the poor: examples include credit-life insurance built into loans and life insurance built into long-term savings products.”
“Speed and ease of payout matter a great deal to households, and improving these systems would make these types of plans attractive and beneficial to more poor households.”

Why poor people gravitate towards loans and savings over insurance?
“With private insurance unavailable and holes in safety nets, the financial tools for dealing with risk will likely continue to be savings and loans, and not just because of the unavailability of formal insurance. A big advantage of loans and savings is that they are general purpose tools. Money is fungible, so that a loan issued for one use can be diverted to deal with an emergency if necessary. Insurance is not structured in this way: providers need to be certain that money is only paid out against the insure event.”
“After all, the insured rick may, never occur, in which case insurance premiums give no return (other than peace of mind), whereas savings become available for other uses.”

Why insurance products linked to savings and loans become attractive?
For the above mentioned reason, “schemes where insurance coverage is attached to what are essentially loan and savings products – as in credit-life insurance, and in life-endowment savings – may appeal to poor households than a fat portfolio of policies against each and every risk.”

Why de-bundle it?
“The cost of commercially viable comprehensive health insurance to poor households…would almost surely entail premium payments that would be beyond the reach of even the best-off households. But there could nevertheless be substantial demand for cheaper – but more limited – partial health coverage, such as prescription drug benefits or catastrophic health coverage.”

General insights:
“the portfolio approach suggests that is not necessary to solve an entire problem in order to improve the well being of poor communities.”
“unreliability in financial tools reinforces other areas of vulnerability in the lives of the poor.”

I would like to hear more from you if you are using (or planning to use) these insights to build financial services for the next billion. Please do write to me at sagar@humane.network.





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s